Showing posts with label First Energy Corp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label First Energy Corp. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Protection of Sheltering In Place-The 40 Percent Truth

My morning coffee was interrupted by the ringing of the phone...it turned out to be the reverse 911 system calling to let me know that Entergy's new siren close to my home will be sounding off today somewhere between 9-11:30 AM as Indian Point tries to get its new system to perform correctly. Happy, happy, joy, joy. Being in a generous mood this morning, lets assume that the system actually works. Now, lets assume there is a fast breaking event at the facility, and the alarms are going off in at least 94 percent (The NRC benchmark for pass/fail) of the affected area.

Assuming everyone is at home for this event, you grab your wife/husband, children, and Pedro the dog and rush into the house to begin implementation of the Emergency Evacuation Plan. As the children race through the house closing up windows, Pedro is barking incessantly, and you run to retrieve your handy roll of duct tape, your wife turns to channel 12 to listen for updates. In truth, there is a very real chance that your local news station is not going to have anything of much use for as long as a couple hours! Hey, it takes time to get everyone in place, ascertain the full scope of the emergency, then start feeding information and instructions out to the media, and from there out onto the now contaminated airwaves. Not to worry...the folks at Homeland Security and FEMA have made available to the media some pre-made (CANNED) messages to keep you calm during this potentially grave period of uncertainty.

STAY OR GO? Based on the above, the odds are, that you need to make this call sooner rather than later. Fact-if (as GNB suspects) it takes a couple of hours for the various agencies to get their act together and give the public its marching orders, full chaos will have already broken out. It is commonsense to believe this...if you hear the sirens, if it is an actual emergency, how long are you going to be sitting idly by waiting on Channel 12 to give you news you can use? If you follow the rules, the best advice on avoiding exposure is putting DISTANCE between you and the source, so EVACUATE.

Grabbing a few carefully chosen possessions, you scoop up Pedro the dog, and race the family down to the street and leap into the mini-van to make your escape. You put the car in gear, drive two blocks and run smack dab into a wall to wall, bumper to bumper traffic jam on Whelcher Street...WHOOPS, the doubters were right, evacuation will not work. With 27 cars now honking behind you, the realization hits...we have to shelter in place.Throwing the car in park, you, Pedro the dog,the wife and kids set off back to the house to shelter in place, abandoning the minivan where it sits.

Safe and secure back in your home,you begin implementation of plan B as the announcer tells you again for the forty third time to stay tuned for breaking news and instructions on this breaking nuclear event. As you are taping off the windows in the attic bedroom you glance towards Indian Point's Domes only to see that one of them is missing, and a large plumb/explosion has lifted up into the sky...breaking into a chilled sweat you scream at your family to move everything down into the basement.

Windows shut and taped over with plastic, the doors locked, you and your family sit huddled together in the basement that has no heat, the children whimpering as you wait for news and updates...so far, all you have gotten from Channel 12, is that you are expected to SHELTER IN PLACE. Do you really think the news that the core has been breached is going to be let out onto the airwaves sooner than later, risking mass hysteria in the New York city area, home to over 20 million people...sorry, no amount of security could control that situation, so they are going to clamp down on the news by throwing up and exclusion zone.

Enter the plain truth...according to the Center for Disease Control, if you shelter in your basement in a typical wood frame house, you, your wife/husband, your children and Pedro the dog are only protected from FORTY PERCENT of the radioactive contaminants in a BEST CASE SCENARIO. Houston, we have a problem! This gives you less than a 50/50 chance of coming out of a significant radiological event and/or terrorist attack unscathed if the NRC and your local officials order you sheltered in place.

Some 12-14 hours into this event you notice your children (who are more susceptible)are vomiting profusely. Somehow, you have to get them to the hospital, so you protect yourselves the best you can, and make a mad dash through the falling radioactive particles to your second car that is parked in the garage. Somehow, you make it through the chaos to the Hudson Valley Medical Center Emergency Room (sponsored by Entergy)that has been recieving MASS CASUALTIES. Citizens are being corraled into roped off areas OUTSIDE the facility in the radioactive fallout area. Sorry, but if you go to the REAC/TS site and read their Radiological Triage document, this is NOT some far out concocted scenerio written by some drug crazed, long haired hippie. The walking wounded, and those who may have been exposed take a second seat to the seriously wounded. Further, the REACT/TS site admits that staff could be over run.

To deal with this reality, emergency planners have been instructed to A) suspend the rule of law in the exclusion zone, and B) have adequate law/military enforcement on the scene at hospitals to control a frenzied, out of control general public...in short, even though your children are exhibiting all the signs of radioactive contamination, it could be hours, even days before they are attended to. They may survive the incident, but they are now a cancer death waiting to happen, months or years later.

The NRC and NEI adit they have far to little knowledge on the effects brittling will have on a reactor core's susceptibility to thermal shock. As a potter, I can tell you a vessel that experiences thermal shock will shatter, plan and simple, sending shards exploding into the atmosphere. With this uncertainty, with the very real fact that sheltering in place only protects you from 40 percent of the fallout, can we really afford to relicense Indian Point for 20 more years?

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

Anti-Trust Complaint Filed With Department of Justice Against Some Major Members Of ACE NY, AWEA and Wind Industry

Seems a whole slew of people have some serious issues with certain members of the wind industry....Green Nuclear Butterfly is reviewing the documents filed with the Department of Justice now to see which of those major wind players have associations directly and indirectly with the nuclear industry...stay tuned!

http://www.cohoctonfree.com/updates/items/Antitrust4-25-07.pdf

Complaint Filed on April 25, 2007 with the Department of Justice under the Sherman Antitrust Act by Concerned Citizens from the States of New York, Vermont, Maryland, and California.

Nature of Complaint

This is an Antitrust Complaint alleging that an International Cartel is engaged in Market Allocation, Price Fixing and Bid Rigging in Windfarm Developments in New York and Vermont, as well as other states across the nation. This Complaint was submitted by 94 concerned citizens via email to the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division on April 25, 2007.

Summary of Complaint

A number of foreign companies, along with at least one domestic firm, have conspired to eliminate competition in the newly emerging domestic wind energy industry.Through a maze of ad hoc LLC’s, partnerships, affiliations, cross-ownerships, strategic alliances,memoranda of understanding, joint ventures, and associations these entities have allocated the market geographically and effectively prohibited any manner of competition for highly profitable business ventures. The end result of this collusion is that thousands of landowners and hundreds of municipalities have been denied substantial monetary gains that would otherwise be available in a free and competitive market. Due to a plethora of subsidies, incentives, and tax breaks the wind energy developments are highly profitable and virtually all of the earnings are funneled abroad to the foreign owners and investors.

Companies, Individuals, and Organizations Involved

1. Babcock and Brown: described as an international investment, advisory and infrastructure firm. Babcock and Brown member of ACE NY It should also be noted, that John Calloway, Chief Development Officer for Babcock and Brown is on the board of AWEA!

..Babcock and Brown: based in Sydney, Australia and trades on the ASX
as symbol BBN.

..Babcock and Brown Ltd.: involved in investment banking, structured finance advisory, arrangement and management business, principal investment and other wholesale financial services. It is controlled by BBN, and trades as BNB on ASX. BNB is a major investor in global windfarm development and operation. BNB has a total market capitalization of over $8.5 billion, of which $3.825 billion is owned by
the executives of the bank.

..Global Wind Partners: an investment fund, 67% of which is owned by BBN and BNB.

..Babcock and Brown Wind Partners: a listed fund; apparently a successor to Global Wind Partners that comprises three funds: Babcock and Brown Wind Partners Trust, Babcock and Brown Wind Partners Ltd, and Babcock and Brown Wind Partners (Bermuda) Ltd. Following an IPO in 1995, this fund traded on the ASX as symbol BBW. This investment fund is described as being managed by Babcock and Brown (BNB).

..Babcock and Brown Infrastructure Management Pty. Ltd. (BBIM):formerly known as Prime Infrastructure, it is an investment fund that had some oversight responsibility or ownership of Babcock and Brown Wind Partners.

..Babcock and Brown Infrastructure (BBI): a listed fund, managed by BBIM.

..Babcock and Brown Power: a listed fund; owns two power-generating stations in Australia (acquired in 2006), one of which is called Ecogen.

..Babcock and Brown Operating Partners LP (later became an LLC?): based in San Francisco and responsible for at least some of Babcock and Brown’s US operations. This unit has a joint venture with BP Alternative Energy North America for the development of a 300MW windfarm in Weld County CO. Babcock and Brown LP (presumably an informal name for Babcock and Brown Operating Partners LP) is described as an equity investor in Sweetwater Wind Power Project in Texas. They are partnered in this project with DKR Development LLC (the project developer), Catamount Energy Corp. (also an equity investor) and TXU (the utility Antitrust Complaint – April 25, 2007 8 buying 100% of the project’s electricity). DKR Development was founded in 2001 by four former Enron executives, one of whom serves on the Catamount Board of Directors.

..Babcock and Brown Power Operating Partners, described as a wholly owned subsidiary of BNB, acquired 100% of the membership interests in G3 Energy LLC in January of 2005. G3 Energy was involved with the development of windfarms in 4 states and Canada. Babcock and Brown Power Operating Partners, on September 8, 2005, won preliminary approval for a $300M 400 MW transmission line to bring power into San Francisco (Trans Bay Cable). Babcock and Brown Power Operating Partners, on 6-5-06, announced a deal to purchase 443MW of wind turbines from Mitsubishi for projects in New Mexico, Colorado, and Texas. Mitsubishi Power Systems (MPS) will also provide wind turbine commissioning, installation support and maintenance for 5 years.Babcock and Brown Power Operating Partners, on 1-23-06, announced that it had selected enXco, Inc. to provide operations and management support for B+B’s Kumeyaay project near San Diego. In the 11-30-06 DOE/EIA listing of power plants, Babcock and Brown
Power Operating Partners is designated as Utility ID # 50123, and as the Company associated with the Plant named Ecogen Wind in Italy NY and Prattsburgh NY.

..BBPOP Wind Equity LLC.

..BBWP (US) LLC.

..B+B Eifel UK Ltd.: a partner in a windfarm in Germany that later was acquired by B+B.

..GWP Pty. Ltd.

..BBI US Holdings Pty. Ltd.

..BBI US Holdings II Ltd.

..BBI Glacier Corp

..Sweetwater Wind 1 LLC, Sweetwater Wind 2 LLC, Sweetwater 3 LLC, Sweetwater Wind 4 LLC, and Sweetwater 5 LLC Antitrust Complaint – April 25, 2007 9

..Eurus Combine Hills 1 LLC

..Blue Canyon Windpower LLC

..Caprock Wind LLC

..Kumeyaay Wind LLC

..Jersey-Atlantic Wind LLC

..Wind Park Bear creek LLC

..Crescent Ridge LLC

..Argonnne Wind LLC

..GSG LLC

..Buena Vista Energy LLC

..Ecogen LLC and Ecogen Wind LLC ACE NY member. Also a member of AWEA.

..Cedar Creek Wind Energy LLC

..Cross-Sound Cable Company LLC

..Trans Bay Cable LLC

Green Nuclear Butterfly Under Corporate Surveillance?




One of the nice things about the Internet, is you can to some degree tell when others are snooping around your blog...so, the question is, who has ordered Reputrace to snoop around on the Green Nuclear Butterfly blog? Maybe we should hire them to track down the thugs that have been maligning us on line. If I were a betting man, guessing it's associated with the email I got from and employee of First Energy.


Some of the quotes from RepuTrace that should get your attention as activist.

http://www.reputrace.com/security/

"After locating discussion about a planned environmental protest (3 busloads of protesters) outside a company's location on an on-line chat room, the RepuTrace Team sent an urgent notification-along with the located link-to the company's Corporate Security Department days in advance. As a result, the company was well prepared and deployed uniformed guards in place to ensure all civilian traffic had access to their location and effectively managed the protesters."

"After an environmental activist posted information and a video from a recent demonstration outside a corporation's head office on the Internet, a potentially dangerous comment was posted. The reply disclosed the residential addresses to the entire Board of Directors leaving them and their families open and susceptible to being the target of an act of violence by other like minded extremists." Oh my God, those extremists might have picketed in front of one of the Board of Directors homes! Can't have that social embarrassment now, can we?

This second one amuses me...I reported to both the NRC, and Entergy that an extremist from their side of the equation was outing my personal information, such as home address, where my wife worked, and they shrugged it off. However, if one of their executive's information that is found online gets published, it is a different set of standards?


Update: Seems many within the blogging community are not thrilled at RepuTrace's snooping.

Thursday, May 10, 2007
Victims Of RepuTrace Stalking Unite (CoreX)

Recently, I became aware of a sinister corporate beast slithering through the bloggosphere as various bloggers and their words came under the scrutiny of the RepuTrace! In the coming days and months as this blog is discovered, let the victims of RepuTrace's vile and sinister stalking of bloggers be brought into the light of day as we share our stories of how this blight appeared on our blogs. A visit to their site paints a disturbing picture of a company, and a software meant to stalk and silence our voices one blogger at a time, one environmental activist at a time.

Wednesday, May 2, 2007

Has The Wind Industry Become The Corrupted Step Child of The Nuclear Industry

It would be nice to claim absolute knowledge of mankind's first original intent in using wind as energy. Seeing as the first use of windmills goes back to the Persians some 500-900 years before the birth of Christ, long before the invention of the modern day grid, that is impossible to do. The first known uses for the energy produced from windmills was the pumping of water, and from there, the grinding of grains. One of the most beautifully scenic and successful applications of windpower based on longevity (and one that still exists), is use of water pumping machines on the island of Crete. Here, hundreds of sail-rotor windmills pump water for crops and livestock. Regardless of original intent, wind energy has a long, clean and noble heritage

As a child growing up in rural America, I have fond memories of small windmills operating on nearby farms. To this day, cannot drive past one of the old steel bladed water pumping windmills without stopping to take a picture, though most of them are now rusted and inoperable. Time rushes down the river into the ocean of forever, and the world changes in the blink of an eye. Perhaps it is these childhood memories of mine, a leftover naivete from youth that had me believing in wind as a pure, clean and noble source of renewable energy.

So, what went wrong, when did wind become corrupt? Or perhaps, it is not the wind itself, but the wind industry that has become corrupt, its honor tarnished, its nobility long ago lost as it prostitutes itself to the highest bidder as earth raping utilities fight among themselves in the war to green their images in the public eye.

As we have seen, wind energy is not new, nor is the concept of using wind mills for the production of electricity. The first use of a large windmill to generate electricity was built in 1888 by Charles F. Brush in Cleveland, Ohio and operated successfully for almost 20 years. The wind industry as we know it today was born. In 1891, the Dane Poul La Cour designed and built the first electrical output wind machine to incorporate the aerodynamic design principles used in the best European tower mills. These safe, vital and secure wind mills were quite practical for electricity generation. At the end of World War I, the use of 25 kilowatt electrical output wind machines had spread throughout Denmark, but sadly larger fossil-fuel steam plants soon put the operators of these mills out of business and wind energy was relegated to some shelf waiting for a time when it would be of use and value once more.

Find it rather tragic that a renewable energy so pure, that was pushed aside by the vast over consumption and burning of fossil fuels, is now being adopted as the bastard child of the coming Nuclear Renaissance, given a place at the table for no other reason than to green the image of some of the largest and most vile polluters of the 20th and young 21st century. Some folks, including, ACE NY, tell me it does not matter how the windmills are built, only that they are...their reasoning, we need the energy. Where is the nobleness in that, where is a concern for making our mother earth a cleaner greener place in such mindsets? If wind power is nothing more than an addition to the grid to feed our ever growing demand for more and more electrons, rather than a means to remove foul, polluted energy from it, what is the purpose, why are we fooling ourselves with yet another feel good placebo that we gladly pay an extra 2.5 cents a unit for?

Can see all the PTA mothers in their Hummers strutting their stuff, proudly proclaiming their self important contribution to a cleaner, greener earth thanks to their participation in Exelon's Pecowind green energy program. It's OK, Exelon tells you so on their GREEN SITE when they state, "Strengthen your organization’s image while doing your part for the environment and your community." Am I the only one hearing the voice of the Church Lady as she loudly exclaims, " Well, isn't that SPECIAL?" Al Gore, and his inconvenient electric bill, Patrick Moore cashing in his honor for a pocket full of gold as the iceburgs melt away towards the ocean's floor.

Lemmings marching towards the cliff, ready to plunge to their death, and most seem so self absorbed that they have no clue. We have John Hall in the Congress, but he seems to have sold out to the perks that come with the title in front of his name. Hillary is the forked tongue Mistress of the dark dreaming of being president, and even Barrack Obama is not without sin as we wait for Mr. Bojangles or the Tamborine Man to ride into town to save the day. Wake up America, it does not happen that way, the world cannot be saved waiting on others to do the work. Global Warming will not dissappear if Wind Energy is used as a feel good placebo, instead of a true alternative energy.

EXAMPLES OF THE UGLY TRUTH THAT IS WIND ENERGY

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER (AEP)-spent $175 million to buy the 160-megawatt (MW) Indian Mesa wind plant in West Texas. Previously, AEP had invested $160 million to build its own 150-MW wind farm at Trent Mesa, also in West Texas.

Criminal Investigation Sought Following Whistleblower Claims of Pollution Violations
By Sandy Smith
http://www.occupationalhazards.com/News/Article/37092/Criminal_Investigation_Sought_Following_Whistleblower_Claims_of_Pollution_Violations.aspx
"BP's chief pipeline inspection expert in the United States took the Fifth Amendment under oath rather than explain what he knew about corrosion in the company's oil pipelines in Prudhoe Bay."

Bowoto v. ChevronTexaco Case History
http://www.earthrights.org/site_blurbs/bowoto_v._chevrontexaco_case_history.html

Written by Marco Simons
In May of 1999, victims of gross human rights abuses associated with Chevron's oil production activities in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria filed suit against Chevron in federal court in San Francisco. The case is based on two incidents: the shooting of peaceful protestors at Chevron's Parabe offshore platform and the destruction of two villages by soldiers in Chevron helicopters and boats. It was filed under the Alien Tort Claims Act, which permits suits in U.S. courts against individuals or corporations that commit international human rights violations anywhere in the world, if that person or corporation resides in or visits the United States, as well as under several other laws. The lawsuit has been brought by a coalition of private civil rights and human rights lawyers

ENTERGY, a major utility based in New Orleans, La., purchased a majority interest in the 80-MW Top of Iowa wind farm from Houston, Tex.-based Zilkha Renewable Energy and its partner, Midwest Renewable Energy Corp. Lets not forget, second largest owner of aging reactors in America.

http://riverkeeper.org/campaign.php/indian_point/the_facts/1169

RIVERKEEPER NOTIFIES ENTERGY NUCLEAR NORTHEAST OF INTENT TO SUE FOR VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL TOXIC WASTE LAW AT INDIAN POINT

Under a green pricing program, Entergy Gulf States customers in Baton Rouge and western Louisiana can choose to pay 2.25 cents per kilowatt hour more to buy green or renewable power.

FPL ENERGY, a subsidiary of FPL Corp., which also owns the large utility Florida Power & Light, announced that it had added 844 MW of wind power to its power generation portfolio during 2001. FPL Energy owns 43 wind farms in 15 states throughout the U.S. One particular wind farm, Cerro Gordo Wind Farm, is located in Cerro Gordo County, Iowa.

FPL has a HORRID Nuclear Safety record.

GE POWER SYSTEMS signed an agreement to purchase the manufacturing capability of Enron Wind Corp., the largest U.S.-based utility-scale wind turbine manufacturer.

http://www.cleanupge.org/gemisdeeds.html

GE has a lengthy record of criminal, civil, political and ethical transgressions. Here are a few examples:

In 1995 -- with the establishment of a Presidential Advisory Commission -- the full extent of GE's human experiments with nuclear radiation were revealed. General Electric ran the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Richland, Washington as part of America's weapons program; beginning in 1949, General Electric deliberately released radioactive material to see how far downwind the radioactive material would travel. One cloud drifted four hundred miles, all the way down to the California-Oregon border, carrying perhaps thousands of times more radiation than that emitted at Three Mile Island.

In 1986 Congressman Edward Markey held hearings in which he disclosed that the United States and General Electric had conducted experiments on hundreds of United States citizens who became "nuclear calibration devices for experimenters run amok." According to Markey: "Too many of these experiments used human subjects that were captive audiences or populations ...considered 'expendable' ...the elderly, prisoners and hospital patients who might not have retained their full faculties for informed consent. "

One of GE's most gruesome experiments --disclosed in the Markey hearings --was performed on inmates at a prison in Walla Walla, Washington, near Hanford. Starting in 1963, sixty-four prisoners had their scrotums and testes irradiated to determine the effects of radiation on human reproductive organs.

PACIFICORP POWER MARKETING (PPM), affiliated with Pacificorp, a large utility based in Portland, Ore., is playing a major role in building the market for wind in the Northwest. The company is purchasing and marketing power from three wind plants in the West, including the 261-MW Stateline Project, and has said it plans to add substantial wind capacity to its portfolio over the next few years.

http://rogueimc.org/en/2007/01/7821.shtml

PacifiCorp to be sued for polluting Klamath
Klamath Riverkeeper , 18.01.2007 13:36

YREKA, CA- Klamath Riverkeeper sent a 60 day notice of intent to file a lawsuit today against Warren Buffett’s PacifiCorp for polluting one of the nation’s most important and controversial salmon rivers, the Klamath. Klamath Riverkeeper’s lawsuit asserts that operation of the Iron Gate Dam hatchery is just one of the ways that PacifiCorp, as the owner of the four Klamath dams, is destroying the River, its salmon runs, and the coastal fishing economies.

SHELL subsidiary Shell WindEnergy, Inc., purchased an 80-MW wind plant near Amarillo, Tex. "We are delighted to have moved so quickly in making a second major investment in the U.S. wind power market," said David Jones, Director of Shell WindEnergy, Inc. "Wind energy is not only the fastest-growing area of power generation worldwide but it is also one of the cleanest sources of energy." Shell WindEnergy also owns a 50-MW wind project in Wyoming, and Shell is developing or operating more than 1,000 MW of wind in the U.S. and Europe.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=aFuUrktb3BjM&refer=europe

Russia Sues to Halt Shell's $20 Billion Oil Project (Update5)

By Lucian Kim

Sept. 5 (Bloomberg) -- Russia sued to halt Royal Dutch Shell Plc's $20 billion Sakhalin oil and gas project as President Vladimir Putin's government increased pressure to gain control of the development.

The Natural Resources Ministry is citing environmental violations at Sakhalin-2, which will produce the equivalent of a third of China's gas needs. Sakhalin is key to Shell's plans to increase output and take on more projects in Russia, the world's biggest exporter of natural gas and second-largest oil supplier.

TXU, a large utility based in Dallas, Tex., announced in early January that it plans to purchase a 40% equity stake in two wind farms under construction in central Spain. TXU is already one of the largest U.S. purchasers of wind-generated electricity, buying the output of several Texas wind plants. Also has ugly ties to nuclear.

http://dallas.bizjournals.com/dallas/stories/2006/10/02/daily5.html

Groups give TXU 60-day warning
Two environmental groups have sent a letter to TXU telling the company to correct alleged violations of clean air standards related to a proposed coal-fired plant -- or else.

CleanCOALition and Robertson County Our Land Our Lives, say TXU's permit application for the Oak Grove coal-fired plant in Robertson County fails to analyze the impact of the plant's emissions on downwind cities. Some preliminary research has found wind blows nitrogen oxide, or NOx, into the Dallas-Fort Worth area from outside nine area counties.

*TXU is also in the nuclear reactor business.

PECOwind, Owned by Exelon-largest owner of failing reactors in America.

Strengthen your organization’s image while doing your part for the environment and your community. Exelon's sales pitch to companies wanting to GREEN their image.

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

Mark Gillis Admits First Energy Reactors Poison?

Mark Gillis (gillism@firstenergycorp.com), involved in Fleet Design Engineering for First Energy of David-Besse hole in the reactor dome fame, read Green Nuclear Butterfly's expose on ACE NY that was posted over the weekend. Seems he was impressed by the scope of our research, but confused with our position that A) the nuclear industry is not to be trusted, and B) the wind industry (ACE NY) is wrong to let the nuclear industry use them to green their image for 35 pieces of silver. More interesting, were comments within his email on his own industry, and a suggestion that we should allow as much alternative energy onto the grid as possible so that big time polluters could be shut down...sure in his own mind, aging brittling reactors are not included in that list of BIG TIME POLLUTERS who could/should be removed from the grid.
First, Mark Gillis refers to his company's, the industry's fleet of reactors as poison toads:

"In the swamp ofhuman suffering, it seems you are more interested in trying to kill a peskypoison toad while ignoring all the much more dangerous alligators."
We have a significant nuclear industry admitting here that reactors are POISON! He tries to paint reactors as the lessor of various issues, but admits the reactors are poison. Significant admission considering the Nuclear Industry's BATTLE CRY of vital, safe and secure.

Mark's comment on Green Energy as arguement for taking polluting energy off the grid reads as follows:
"The more "green" power on the grid, the easier it is to make the argument that we should shut down the big polluters."
Governor Spitzer has said Indian Point should be closed when it's energy on the grid can be replaced. ACE NY has a stated goal of putting 3000 Megawatts of wind power up on too New York's grid by 2015. Based on Mark Gillis of First Energy's email statements, ACE NY's stated wind goals, and Elliot Spitzer's own publically stated policy goals, the Green Nuclear Butterfly calls on Governor Spitzer, ACE NY, Mark Gillis and First Energy (a member of ACE NY) to publically pledge to the citizens and grassroots of New York that ACE NY's wind additions to our grid will count towards the necessary electron flows needed to shut down Entergy's aging, brittling and failing Indian Point Reactors.

We encourage our readers to email Mark encouraging him to make this public pledge, or if you like, give him a ring!

Mark R. Gillis Fleet Design Engineering, AK-GO-14 8-825-5540 (330-384-5540), Cell 330-472-7559

Monday, April 30, 2007

Sheltering In Place-NRC Verse State Department Views


The basic concept of our United States democracy is justice and fairness for all. We have this sense if you will of societal equity. What does this have to do with the NRC, evacuations and/or readiness plans, and nuclear reactors...perhaps everything.

For reasons of convenience (for their licensees), the NRC would have us believe that sheltering in place is A) highly unlikely, and B)if necessary would only be for a few hours, a couple of days at most. If you research the United States Department of State web page regarding issues of radioactive terrorism, or a nuclear incident at a reactor site, they have a far different opinion, CLEARLY the possibility of citizens being sheltered in place not for days, but weeks.

Reactor host community evacuation plans have not prepared any of us for a weeks long period of in home sheltering, none of us are truly prepared for such a reality. Further, many people simply do not have the financial ability to properly prepare and stock a sheltering area in their home for such a significantly long period of time.

With Entergy having just filed their application for license renewal of the Indian Point reactors, thinking we need to get this sheltering discrepancy resolved. With this in mind, was thinking it might be good for a few thousand of us to give Condi Rice and her staff a phone call to verify the information on the Department of States web site. To help us in that goal, I've taken the liberty of having the phone numbers readily available for your dialing pleasure.


Monday, January 8, 2007

CASEnery exposed

Dear Friends - Please note that the Vermont Chamber of Commerce and Vermont Energy Partnership are members of Patrick Moore's phony clean energy group, which is entirely funded by the Nuclear Energy Institute. See below for full expose. The Vermont Energy Partnership is a front group of VY nuclear supporters spreading the NEI SPIN and pro nuclear dogma.

Expose of Patrick Moore’s group:

Clean and Safe Energy Coalition

From SourceWatch (Project Center for Media & Democracy) December 22, 2006 update

The Clean and Safe Energy Coaltion is a public relations campaign for new reactors launched April 24, 2006, funded by the trade association, the Nuclear Energy Institute, and headed by former Bush Environmental Protection Agency administrator, Christine Todd Whitman and Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore, who left that group in 1986. [1]

Contents

Mission Statement

According to the group's website, "The Clean and Safe Energy Coalition (CASEnergy Coalition) supports the increased use of nuclear energy to ensure an environmentally clean, safe, affordable and reliable supply of electricity. Nuclear power enhances America's energy security and economic growth, helps attain cleaner air and improves the quality of life, health and economic well-being for all Americans." [2]

Members

Organizations

As of May 5, the website listed the following organizations as members [3]:

Individuals

The group listed the following "sampling of individuals" as of May 5, 2006 [5]:

  • Iowa State Representative Philip Wise

  • New Hampshire State Representatives Caitlin A. Daniuk and Michael Rollo

  • Michigan State Senator Buzz Thomas

  • Reverend Willie Toone - North End Church of God and Christ, Michigan

  • Reverend Charles Williams - Michigan

  • Greg Fedon - Warren Jaycees - Michigan

  • Barney Bishop, President, Associated Industries of Florida

  • Brownstone, Michigan Town Supervisor Arthur Wright

  • Denis Beller, Professor, University of Las Vegas

  • Mike Hamby - Former Executive Director of the Florida Democratic Party

  • Keith Bullen - Volt Technical Services

  • Jim Scaratino -
  • Coalition for New Mexico Wilderness
  • Berol Robinson -
  • Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy
  • Christopher Yeaw - United States Naval War College
Funding

In April 2006 a spokesman for the NEI told New York Times reporter, Matthew L. Ward,
that it was providing all the funding for the group but refused to state what the budget was. [6]

External Links
Retrieved from
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Clean_and_Safe_Energy_Coalition

Categories: Environment Front groups Nuclear PR United States

[~PR – Greenwashing] [~PR]

"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that really matter." ~MLK